In Historical Context, Economics Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller Examines Bitcoin

On Monday talking about the way the allure of bitcoin fits previous attempts to reinvent money in his published article is Professor Robert Shiller, who received the 2013 Nobel prize in economics and is famous for the Case-Shiller Index.
Bitcoin in the context of time-based and electricity-backed experimental forms of alternative money.

How cryptocurrency can maintain a high level of enthusiasm in face of constant warnings that it’s all just a bit scam, is the main question Shiller was trying to answer. He puts the subject in hand in the context of time-based and electricity-backed experimental forms of alternative money, instead of comparing bitcoin to past technological solutions, has been done many times before.

He also compared it to attempt to reshape how governments and their economic operators, putting the technology of Bitcoin on the same level as the primary political movement. The Euro-which was designed to aid unite former warring nations-is still around, and while novel ideas by communist and technocratic thinkers have failed.

Not Enough is the revolutionary zeal

Shiller detail that, a unique technological story has been coupled with each of these monetary innovations. He further added that in efforts for some kind of revolution in society, all are connected with a deep yearning, according to He then stated that cryptocurrencies are viewed as a long train of inequality which is as a result of a statement of faith in a new community of entrepreneurial cosmopolitans who themselves above national governments, as indicated by

He also noted that consisting in the new money’s connection to advanced science, like the mystery of the value of money itself, the public’s fascination with cryptocurrencies is tied to a sort of mystery, and, as in the past, as reported by He also concluded that “Practically no one, outside of computer science department, can explain how cryptocurrencies work. That mystery creates an aura of exclusivity, gives the new money glamour, and fills devotees with revolutionary zeal. None of this is new, and, as with past monetary innovations, a compelling story may not be enough,” as reported by

It is certainly accepted that having a story is enough by itself, which is why bitcoin entrepreneurs continue to work on the exciting use case that can only be made possible with this revolutionary technology, whether it is true or not that only computer scientist understand cryptocurrencies today.


Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.